Welcome, Guest. Register Now!


» Categories
 
Individual
 » Income
 » IRA/Sep
 » Medical
 
Corporations
 
Financial Planning
 
 
 



» Find a Tax Professional near you!
Enter your Zipcode:

OR
To browse by Category or Location Click Here

View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2008, 12:12 PM
TaxGuru TaxGuru is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 1,124
Blog Entries: 2
I personally don't like this set up, because, income from the Real Estate is usually considered passive income not subject to S/E tax, whereas the 1099-Misc is considered Active income that is subject to the S/E Tax! Thus, taking a distribution and treating it as a 1099-Misc is subjecting you to the S/E tax.

Further, I am not sure that this is best course of action assuming you continue with this set up. You really should be taking a Corporate Salary instead of a distribution as a 1099-Misc.

Also, I am not sure why you would be holding passive income in a Corporation and subject your corporation to the Personal Holding Company Tax! It would appear that you meet the criteria of being considered a Personal Holding Company as your adjusted income from Rents would be more than 50% of adjusted ordinary gross income!

In short, I strongly advise you to contact a CPA who is very experienced in Real Estate Practice, to review this set up with respect to the tax aspects of this deal.
__________________
Ask TaxGuru
Please refer to the legal disclaimer.
Reply With Quote