Welcome, Guest. Register Now!


» Categories
 
Individual
 » Income
 » IRA/Sep
 » Medical
 
Corporations
 
Financial Planning
 
 
 



» Find a Tax Professional near you!
Enter your Zipcode:

OR
To browse by Category or Location Click Here

View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-31-2007, 01:33 AM
TaxGuru TaxGuru is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 1,124
Blog Entries: 2
This is a great question!

On the surface, it appears smart to have your wive take a salary. This will enable her to contribute into the social security system with the long term beneficial outcome if you believe, that is, the social security system will be solvent.

I have also heard from loan officers that if both spouses have income it makes for a better credit rating on the couple. I am not 100% certain of this, but this seems to be opinion of some in industry.

The cost of putting your wive on the payroll after you have profits of more than $94,700 would be that she will be paying social security taxes along with medicare taxes, at a combined rate of 7.65% x 2=15.3%.

(Note Social security taxes = 6.2%, Medicare taxes = 1.45%)

Whereas, had you continued taking income after you reached this amount, you would not be subject to Social security taxes of 6.2% and an additional amount matched by your corporation of 6.2%. Hence, you would have saved 12.4% on $42,000.

Medicare taxes have no limits applied to salary, unlike Social Security taxes.

So, you have to decide whether this additional cost of 12.4% x 42,000 = $5,208 offsets the benefits discusses above.
__________________
Ask TaxGuru
Please refer to the legal disclaimer.
Reply With Quote